Page 29 - Service Delivery Review_Volume 14_Number 3_2022
P. 29

KM CoP Case Studies




       FOCUS AND SCOPE OF KM                                  KM CHAMPIONS

       The NT KM strategy is focused on three main issues, name-  We have been fortunate that the leadership of the NT has
       ly: (1) the development and implementation of an Integrated   always been aware of the benefits of KM to the organisa-
       Knowledge Processing System; (2) facilitating the adoption   tion. Much of this goes back to the early 2000s when the
       and implementation of knowledge operations in the busi-  department took the first baby steps towards KM. Over the
       ness  units; and (3)  organisational  capacity  building  and   years  this  has  created  an  enabling  environment  that  en-
       end-to-end business process mapping.                   courages experimentation and trial and error. Moreover, the
                                                              different chief directorates within the NT continue to dem-
       Integrated Knowledge Processing System                 onstrate high levels of awareness and appreciation of the
       This focus area drives the formalisation and standardisation   value add of KM in their work. Not only do they value the
       of knowledge processing within the NT. We do this tacti-  partnership with their KM colleagues, but this value shows
       cally by creating awareness of the benefits of KM for the   itself in willingness to plan and allocate resources for their
       respective operational areas.                          specific KM related needs.
       Knowledge operations in the business units             LESSON LEARNED
       This  focus  area  concerns  facilitation  of  the  adoption  and
       implementation of knowledge operations in the business   We at the National Treasury have been on this long journey
       units. Its purpose is to support and enable NT divisions to   of institutionalising KM. It is a process that is far from over
       embed and implement knowledge operations in their busi-  and one that we continue to learn from and refine as our
       ness processes.                                        business environment evolves. In conclusion, this section
                                                              looks at some of the lessons learned over the past decade
       Business process mapping                               or so of grappling with the complexities of implementing
       This focus area relates to organisational capacity building   KM.
       and end-to-end business process mapping to ensure the
       development, implementation and maintenance of opera-  Evidence-based approach
       tional business processes, procedures and how-to guides   We  have  learned  that  KM can  best be sold by using  the
       for business units within the NT. Emphasis on business pro-  evidence-based approach. This means being sure of your
       cess mapping was a major entry point for selling KM within   story when you engage executives and other senior man-
       the NT as people could thereby directly see the interven-  agers. Building evidence might include benchmarking and
       tion’s value add.                                      supporting  your  case  from a range  of sources,  including
                                                              your peers in the Public Sector. It may even involve being
       LOCATION                                               brave enough to open yourself up to internal auditing pro-
                                                              cesses, in the process of which, in the NT, our colleagues
       While in the preceding sections the location of KM activities   did their independent research and benchmarking, produc-
       was inferred, its importance merits clear restatement. The   ing valuable feedback.
       decentralised approach we have taken to the implementa-
       tion is such that the various business units define their own   Avoid one-size-fits-all
       KM needs. These needs are based on their respective busi-  We are often encouraged to craft KM strategies to bring uni-
       ness processes so as to ensure ownership and account-  formity in implementation. This might suggest that advising
       ability. A KM practitioner might not be an expert in account-  against taking a one-size-fits-all approach is a contradiction.
       ing  or any  other area  of  business  within the NT. In other   However, introducing something new and not easily under-
       words, one might not be able to operationally manage that   stood calls for a nuanced approach. To build trust, a lot of
       knowledge but be able to support the respective experts in   time needs to be spent on educating or creating spaces for
       managing their knowledge. In this sense, the KM Directo-  conversations.  Moreover,  committing to change  manage-
       rate is like a group of consultants to the other functional   ment through KM is in the first place about creating aware-
       areas of the NT.                                       ness, educating and repeating yourself. Have a THICK SKIN.
                                                              This determines whether you are going to break through or
       The KM Directorate itself is located within Corporate Ser-  not.
       vices and therefore benefits from the coordination role that
       that division plays in the development and implementation   Through sustained conversations, we have learned that it
       of  corporate-wide policies.  Moreover, strategic  planning,   does not help to be dogmatic and pushy in selling KM in our
       monitoring and evaluation are corporate service functions.   organisations. From a practitioner perspective, KM might be
       This kind of proximity is a game-changer in terms of trans-  a matter of “life or death”, but to colleagues burdened by
       lating policy to practice. It ensures that KM becomes part of   work and capacity issues, it might be a “nice to have”.
       the planning, monitoring and evaluation processes.
                                                              Focus on quick wins
                                                              A better tactic is to focus on quick wins that demonstrate
                                                              value  and  then  work  backwards to the strategies. At the



                                                                  Volume 14 No.3 of 2022 | SERVICE DELIVERY REVIEW  29
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34