Page 27 - DPSA_SDR Vol12 no1 A4.indd
P. 27

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT CASE STUDY



            The importance of knowledge harvesting


                                           in government





                                    By Dr Ronel Davel, Sars Knowledge Management Specialist


         Knowledge is increasingly recognised as an imperative, strategic resource by all types of organisations and institutions, both
         private and public. Regrettably, for many years public sector organisations across the globe had often been less inclined than
         the private sector to embrace knowledge management (KM) to its full potential (Arora, 2011).


         Of late, the public sector has come to realise the importance of   Knowledge harvesting processes
         KM. This realisation can be attributed to the kind of difficulties
         that have an impact on the efficiencies and effectiveness   If most of our knowledge is unwritten and essentially
         of their services such as potential knowledge loss as a   unsaid, one first needs to elicit this knowledge before it
         result of older employees retiring; problems with retaining   can be articulated, shared and employed in a wider sense.
         knowledgeable personnel (Jaine, 2009) and millennial job   Knowledge harvesting is one way to extract and package tacit
         churn. As a consequence, it has become imperative for the   knowledge so that others can adapt, personalise and apply
         public sector to focus on methodologies that will protect it   it to build organisational capacity, and preserve institutional
         against a potential knowledge drain. One such approach is   memory (Serrat, 2010).
         termed knowledge harvesting.
                                                              Knowledge harvesting processes are ultimately aimed at the
         Defi ning knowledge harvesting                        individuals performing the key tasks within an organisation.
                                                              These processes are designed to not only establish what an
         According to IGI Global (2018), knowledge harvesting can be   expert knows with reference to a particular domain or aspect
         defined as an “… integrated set of processes that allow the   of work, but also the specific how-to and qualified knowledge
         often hidden insight of human expertise to be captured. Then   (when, why, whether, etc.). A typical knowledge harvesting
         it is converted into a specific actionable know-how that can be   project is thus focused on a particular expert or experts.
         transferred to others.”

         Knowledge Harvesting Inc. (2018) refers to knowledge
         harvesting as something that “is used to convert the know-how
         in an expert’s head into information assets that can be used to
         dramatically improve corporate performance, competitiveness
         and valuation.”

         In essence, knowledge harvesting can thus be described as
         the process that is applied to convert the tacit know-how of
         identified experts into explicit information assets to protect
         organisations against the loss and unavailability of expertise
         if, and when, it is needed.

         Value of knowledge harvesting


         According to Snowden (2010), “we always know more than we
         can say, and we will always say more than we can write down.”
         Much of the knowledge that is most critical to an organisation
         thus resides in the heads of employees. When critical
         employees leave the organisation, so does that knowledge.
         Organisations are thus at risk of losing critical knowledge as
         key employees retire or move to new jobs; and the only way
         in which they can protect themselves from the unavailability
         of this expertise when and where it is needed, is if they can
         identify, capture and transfer vital technical, and business
         knowledge in time.








                                                            Volume 12 No. 1 of 2018 | SERVICE DELIVERY REVIEW  25
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32